Analisis Intertekstual Kristeva; antara Metode Ilmiah Rudolf Carnap dan Pemahaman Hadis Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail

Authors

  • Muhammad Almuttaqin UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Irwansya Irwansya UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/jitp.2023.2.2.239-258

Keywords:

Scientific, Hadith, Intertextual

Abstract

This study explores the differences in approach between the scientific method and critical discussion of hadith in the thought of Rudolf Carnap and Muhammad Shuhudi Ismail. Carnap emphasized empirical verification, while Shuhudi Ismail highlighted the historical and cultural context in the understanding of hadith. The research aims to analyze the implications and integration of these two approaches in hadith analysis, as well as identify their potential integration in the perspective of Julia Kristeva. This study uses text analysis to compare Carnap and Syuhudi Ismail's perspectives on the scientific method and critical discussion of hadith. The integration of this approach is analyzed through Kristeva's intertextual approach. The results showed a difference between Carnap's approach that focused on empirical verification and rigorous logic and Syuhudi Ismail's contextual approach that emphasized understanding hadith in historical and cultural contexts. The integration of these two perspectives through Kristeva's intertextual analysis allows for a deeper and scientifically strong understanding of understanding in hadith studies.

References

Ahmad, Arifuddin. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail: paradigma baru memahami hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Intimedia Ciptanusantara, 2003.

Al-Nawawi, Abu Zakaria Yahya Ibn Sharaf. Al-Minhaj Syarh Shahih Muslim bin al-Hajjaj : Syarah Shahih Muslim. Jakarta: Darus Sunnah, 2012.

Anggoro, Taufan. “Analisis Pemikiran Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail Dalam Memahami Hadis.” Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 2 (2019): 94–104.

———. “Studi Hadis di Indonesia: Kajian Atas Hermeneutika Hadis Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2019. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/file/899708.

Asriady, Muhammad. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis.” Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan 16, no. 1 (13 April 2019): 314. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v16i1.94.

Carnap, Rudolf. Logical foundations of probability. Vol. 2. Citeseer, 1962.

———. The Logical Structure ofthe World. Berkeley-Los Angeles, Univ, 1967. h

Carnap, Rudolf, dan Paul Arthur Schilpp. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 1963. https://www.academia.edu/download/31035979/The_Philosophy_of_Rudolf_Carnap.pdf.

Fithoroini, Dayan. “Hadis Nabi yang Tekstual dan Kontekstual (Analisis Pemikiran Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail).” Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies 2, no. 1 (2021). http://journal.tebuireng.ac.id/index.php/nabawi/article/view/42.

Haramain, Muhammad. “Filsafat Dakwah Dalam Hadis Nabi Saw: Analisis Perspektif Syarah Hadis Maudhu’i,” 2014.

Idris, Mhd. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis Modernis.” Jurnal Ulunnuha 7, no. 1 (2018): 29–39.

Irwansya. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis (Studi Pemikiran Arifuddin Ahmad).” Skripsi S1, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, 2021.

Ismail, Syuhudi. “Hadis Nabi yang tekstual dan Kontekstual.” Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1994.

Khotimah, Husnul. “Urgensi Kajian Hadis Di Indonesia: Pemikiran M. Syuhudi Ismail dan Ali Mustafa Ya’qub.” Dirayah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 2 (2023): 188–206.

Kristeva, Julia. “‘ Nous deux’ or a (hi) story of intertextuality.” Romanic Review 93, no. 1/2 (2002): 7.

Minarti, Sri. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam: Fakta teoretis-filosofis dan aplikatif-normatif. Amzah, 2022.

Muslim bin al-Hajjaj, Abu al-Husain al-Naisaburi. Shahih Muslim. Bairut: Darul Jail, 2013.

Natasya, Azzahra, Tiara Putri, Rizki Putri Jasmin Siahaan, dan Ardina Khoirunnisa. “Filsafat Ilmu dan Pengembangan Metode Ilmiah.” Mahaguru: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 3, no. 1 (2022): 167–79.

Quine, Willard Van, dan Rudolf Carnap. Dear Carnap, Dear van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work: Edited and with an Introduction by Richard Creath. Univ of California Press, 1991.

Samiha, Yulia Tri. “Standar menilai teori dalam metode ilmiah pada kajian filsafat ilmu.” Medina-Te: Jurnal Studi Islam 12, no. 2 (2016): 133–42.

Schilpp, Paul Arthur. “The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap,” 1963. https://philpapers.org/rec/SCHTPO-38.

Sianturi, Murdan, dan M. Kom. “Filsafat dan Pengetahuan Modern.” Diakses 19 Oktober 2023. https://pusat-karir-riset.stiemp.ac.id/bukudosen/buku-filsafat-dan-pengetahuan-modern-by-murdan-sianturi.pdf.

Soelaiman, Darwis A., dan Rahmad Syah Putra. “Filsafat ilmu pengetahuan perspektif barat dan islam.” Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan Perspektif Barat Dan Islam, 2019. https://repository.bbg.ac.id/handle/778.

Suaidi, Hasan. Metode Pemahaman Hadis: Studi Komparatif Pemikiran Syuhudi Ismail dan Ali Mustafa Ya’qub. Penerbit NEM, 2018. h

Suriasumantri, Jujun S. “Filsafat ilmu.” Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2007. https://www.academia.edu/download/51768288/Filsafat_Ilmu__Prof_Sunarto_.pdf.

Umar, Umar Hadi. “Rekontruksi Pemikiran Hermeneutika Hadis Syuhudi Ismail.” PAPPASANG 4, no. 1 (2022): 1–24.

Winsink, A.J. Mu’jam al-Mufahras li al-Fādz al-Hadīts. Lieden: Maktabah Bril, 1936.

Additional Files

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Almuttaqin, Muhammad, and Irwansya Irwansya. “Analisis Intertekstual Kristeva; Antara Metode Ilmiah Rudolf Carnap Dan Pemahaman Hadis Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail”. Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy 2, no. 2 (November 30, 2023): 239–258. Accessed February 26, 2024. https://jurnalpps.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/JITP/article/view/419.

Issue

Section

Articles