Optimality Theory Paradigm in the Formation of Active Participles Arabic Quadrilateral Verbs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/jalsat.2023.3.2.207-223

Keywords:

Optimality Theory, Active Participle, Arabic Quadrilateral Verbs, Arabic Language

Abstract

This article aims to investigate the implementation of the Optimality Theory (OT) paradigm in the formation of Active Participle (AP) in quadrilateral verbs in the Arabic language. This approach involves morphological and contrastive linguistic analyses to understand the patterns of PA formation from quadrilateral verbs, with a focus on the hierarchy of criteria and candidate evaluation based on OT principles. The research methodology includes an in-depth study of various forms of PA produced by quadrilateral verbs, identifying rules and preferences that lead to changes in the word forms. The research findings indicate that OT provides profound insights into the complexity of the morphology of quadrilateral verbs, illustrating consistent patterns of change as well as variations depending on grammatical and semantic contexts. The implications of these research findings significantly contribute to the understanding of Arabic linguistic structure, morphological theory, and contrastive analysis methods. By paving the way for further research, this article suggests that paradigm serves as an effective conceptual framework to explain morphological phenomena in the Arabic language, enriching Arabic linguistic literature and supporting the development of advanced morphological analysis methods. This study opens avenues for deeper exploration of linguistic intricacies, fostering academic insights into the Arabic language's structural nuances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Shargi, F., Kaplan, A., Eskander, R., Habash, N., & Rambow, O. (2016). Morphologically Annotated Corpora And Morphological Analyzers For Moroccan And Sanaani Yemeni Arabic. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings Of The Tenth International Conference On Language Resources And Evaluation (Lrec’16) (Pp. 1300–1306). European Language Resources Association (Elra). Https://Aclanthology.Org/L16-1207

Arifuddin, A. (2016). Pembentukan Derivatif Kata Bahasa Arab Dalam Perspektif Mazhab Kuffah. Center Of Middle Eastern Studies (Cmes): Jurnal Studi Timur Tengah, 9(2), 145–157.

Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2022). What Is Morphology? (Blackwell Publishing Ltd). John Wiley & Sons.

Arumningtyas, D. M. (2019). Participle As Seen In The Jakarta Post Headings. Lexicon, 1(2), 176–191.

Benkato, A., & Pereira, C. (2016). An Annotated Bibliography Of Arabic And Berber In Libya. Libyan Studies, 47, 149–165. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/Lis.2016.3

El-Ebiary, Y. A. B., & Issa, K. (2020). The Influence Of Multimedia In Teaching Languages—Arabic Language As A Study. 33(1). Https://Dergipark.Org.Tr/En/Pub/Tjpr

Féry, C., & Vijver, R. Van De. (2003). The Syllable In Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Furnes, B. (2004). Genetic And Functional Characterization Of Human Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase 1–6 (Fmo1–6). University Of California, Riverside. Https://Search.Proquest.Com/Openview/3b9f1f0092c0a5a75ecae97e5e418a44/1?Pq-Origsite=Gscholar&Cbl=18750&Diss=Y

Gaber, G. M. (2012). An Optimality Theory Account Of The Non-Concatenative Morphology Of The Nominal System Of Libyan Arabic, With Special Reference To The Broken Plural. Https://Www.Semanticscholar.Org/Paper/An-Optimality-Theory-Account-Of-The-Morphology-Of-Gaber/785db5681c2ed934c4a5cbddfad0c10d1a4b3911

Gani, S. (2019). Kajian Teoritis Struktur Internal Bahasa (Fonologi, Morfologi, Sintaksis, Dan Semantik). A Jamiy: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 7(1), 1–20.

Jubran Al-Mamri, M. (2021). Patterns Of Consonant Clusters In Word Initial, Medial, And Final Positions In Yemeni Arabic. Jl3t (Journal Of Linguistics, Literature And Language Teaching), 7(1), 41–51. Https://Doi.Org/10.32505/Jl3t.V7i1.2821

Kaplan, T. (1993). A Problematic Structure For The Binding Theory: Arabic Genitives. In M. Eid & C. Holes (Eds.), Perspectives On Arabic Linguistics: Papers From The Annual Symposium On Arabic Linguistics.Volume V: Ann Arbor, Michigan 1991 (P. 195). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Https://Doi.Org/10.1075/Cilt.101.13kap

Kiparsky, P. (2021). Phonology To The Rescue: Nez Perce Morphology Revisited. The Linguistic Review, 38(3), 391–442. Https://Doi.Org/10.1515/Tlr-2021-2071

Luthfan, M. A., & Hadi, S. (2019). Morfologi Bahasa Arab: Reformulasi Sistem Derivasi Dan Infleksi. Alsina : Journal Of Arabic Studies, 1(1), 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.21580/Alsina.1.1.2599

Mardiah, Z., & Hizbullah, N. (2021). Prefiks /T-/ Pada Konjugasi Verba Imperfektif Bahasa Arab, Dalam Tinjauan Optimality Theory / Prefix /T-/ In The Conjugation Of The Arabic Imperfective Verb, In Optimality Theory Perspective. Diwan : Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 7(2), 191. Https://Doi.Org/10.24252/Diwan.V7i2.21213

Mardiah, Z., Hizbullah, N., & Niswah, A. A. (2020). Blocking And Extended Exponence Of Suffix Pronouns In Arabic Perfective Verb Conjugation. International Review Of Humanities Studies, 5(2), 730–745. Https://Doi.Org/10.7454/Irhs.V0i0.270

Mardiah, Z., Hizbullah, N., & Rachman, F. (2023). Paradigma Optimality Theory Dalam Pembentukan Partisipel Aktif Verba Triliteral Bahasa Arab. Diwan : Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 9(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.24252/Diwan.V9i1.33236

Mccarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1990). Prosodic Morphology And Templatic Morphology. In M. Eid & J. Mccarthy (Eds.), Current Issues In Linguistic Theory (Vol. 72, P. 1). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Https://Doi.Org/10.1075/Cilt.72.05mcc

Mccarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness And Reduplicative Identity. Papers In Optimality Theory, 249–384.

Nagle, L. (2020). The Neural Encoding Of Arabic Root Patterns: A Behavioral Pilot Study. Https://Digitalrepository.Salemstate.Edu/Handle/20.500.13013/1403

Nahdiyyin, K. (2019). Struktur Silabi Dan Morfem Dalam Konteks Bahasa Arab. Suka Press. Https://Digilib.Uinsuka.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/42714/1/Dimensi%20tasawuf%20dalam%20film%20sejuta%20sayang%20untuknya.Pdf#Page=256

Nefdt, R. M. (2016). Scientific Modelling In Generative Grammar And The Dynamic Turn In Syntax. Linguistics And Philosophy, 39(5), 357–394. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10988-016-9193-4

Optimality In Grammar: Core Syllabification In Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. (2004). In Optimality Theory (Pp. 14–26). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/9780470759400.Ch2

Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1997). Optimality: From Neural Networks To Universal Grammar. Science (New York, N.Y.), 275, 1604–1610. Https://Doi.Org/10.1126/Science.275.5306.1604

Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2002). Constraint Interaction In Generative Grammar.

Prince, A., & Tesar, B. (2004). Learning Phonotactic Distributions. In Constraints In Phonological Acquisition (Pp. 245–291). Cambridge University Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/Cbo9780511486418.008

Ruslan, R., Abd Safa, N., & Burga, M. A. (2023). Perkembangan Makna Bahasa Arab: Studi Fenomena Semantik Dalam Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (Jpdk), 5(1), 348–359.

Setiawan, R. A., Hidayat, M. S., & Fatimah, F. (2023). Pengertian Dan Hakikat Belajar & Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. 1(1).

Smolensky, P., & Prince, A. S. (2002). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction In Generative Grammar. 8(10). Https://Doi.Org/10.7282/T34m92mv

Versteegh, C. H. M. (1993). Arabic Grammar And Qur’anic Exegesis In Early Islam. E.J. Brill.

Yunita, Y., Febrian, R., Supriyadi, H., & Nofrianti, R. (2022). Development Of Moral Education Teaching Materials For Students At Arabic Education Department. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3623–3634.

Zuhriyah, L., Sholihuddin, A., & Thohir, M. (2018). Proses Afiksasi Morfologi Ism (Nomina) Dalam Bahasa Arab. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 5(2), 292–313.

Downloads

Published

29-11-2023

How to Cite

Zakiyah. (2023). Optimality Theory Paradigm in the Formation of Active Participles Arabic Quadrilateral Verbs. Journal of Arabic Language Studies and Teaching, 3(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.15642/jalsat.2023.3.2.207-223