Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by the Editorial Board. Then, the reports will be sent to the Mitra Bestari/peer reviewer and go to the next selection by the Double-Blind Review Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors for revision. These processes take a month for a maximum time. Mitra Bestari/the peer reviewer in each manuscript will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects. Mitra Bestari/ Peer reviewer that collaborated with Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, is an expert in the public administration area and issues around it. They were experienced in the prestigious journal management and publication that was spread around the nation and abroad.

The editorial staff reads all submitted manuscripts. Those manuscripts that editors evaluated as inappropriate to journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscripts considered potentially interesting to our readership are sent to double-blind reviewers. Based on the reviewer's recommendation, the editors decide among several possibilities: rejected, revision required, or accepted.

The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published

Review Process:

1. The author submits the manuscript.
2. Editor Evaluation (some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process)
3. The double-masked peer review process
4. Editor Decision
5. Confirmation to the author